Cost-effective medical technologies for supporting infection management

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a major global public health threat, with the potential to take us back to a ‘pre-antibiotic era’, where patients could die from simple infections and life-saving care can no longer be delivered safely. The cost of treating complications due to resistant infections can exceed USD 28.9 billion every year across 34 OECD and EU/EEA countries 1. This adds to the burden of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), which is estimated to cost €7 billion in Europe 2.

Moreover:

  • One in five bacterial infections are resistant to antibiotic treatment in OECD countries.
  • Resistant infections claim the lives of around 79 000 people every year across these countries. The elderly bear the brunt of the AMR death toll, with around two out of three deaths due to AMR occurring among people above 65 years of age.
  • Healthcare-associated resistant infections account for more than 60% of AMR-related deaths. 1

These challenges add extra strain to our already overburdened healthcare systems, risking their economic sustainability.

Addressing AMR & HAIs offers a compelling return on investment with a net return of 5 to 13 dollars for every dollar invested, depending on the specific interventions 1 3.

As AMR continues to reduce our ability to effectively manage infections, we need to invest not only in technologies to control and prevent infection, but also in evidence and education to understand which packages of care offer the best approach for each patient based on a holistic risk assessment.

The impact of utilising medical technologies to reduce healthcare costs and productivity losses associated with AMR & HAIs

Medical technologies (medical devices and in vitro diagnostics) contribute to preventing and controlling AMR and HAIs, resulting in cost efficiencies in four distinct ways, illustrated below:

  1. Preventing and containing healthcare-associated infections and the development and spread of resistant bacteria in healthcare settings to manage antimicrobial resistance. Earlier interventions can often avert more costly advanced care, enabling more efficient resource use.
  2. Supporting appropriate therapy by detecting and identifying bacterial infections and their susceptibility to antibiotics, improving patient care and outcomes thus saving costs globally, for now and future generations.
  3. Monitoring and tracking resistance and enabling patient compliance to the appropriate use of antibiotics. Early warnings avoid unnecessary costs.
  4. Outbreak management and surveillance to track, contain, and prevent the spread of pathogens at all levels, from the hospital to international levels. Preparedness is a sound investment.
We invite you to discover some of the health economic benefits of medical technologies throughout the patient pathway.

Interactive Patient Pathway Timeline

1
1

Before admission to the hospital / in the community

The largest proportion of antibiotic consumption in humans takes place in the community (more than 90 % in Europe 4). It is therefore essential that the appropriate use of antibiotics is addressed first in the community setting, to ensure new and existing antibiotics remain effective for as long as possible. For patients undergoing either an elective procedure or an emergency admission in a hospital setting, protocols should be in place to help reduce the risks of HAIs, and the development of resistance. Some non-pharmaceutical interventions have emerged as highly cost-effective when incorporated into a protocol that includes a full risk assessment. Decolonisation using e.g. topical agents, diagnostics, and isolation via contact precaution have been popular approaches to infection control, often surpassing standard care in costs and efficiency 5.

What can be done by technology?

Technology examples:

2
2

Arrival at the hospital

Prompt clinical assessment supported by rapid diagnostic testing for infectious diseases can inform optimum patient management, avoiding unnecessary admission or preventing missed admission and enabling timely isolation decisions. Such an enhanced patient flow reduces pressure on hospital resources, personnel and costs.

What can be done by technology?

Technology examples:

3
3

In the operating room

An infection can occur after surgery in the part of the body where the procedure took place. These are called surgical site infections (SSIs) and account for more than 50% of all adverse events in hospitals 14. Most surgical wound infections are acquired in the operating room from the patient’s own microbial flora. The remainder are acquired mainly from the staff in the operating room during surgery 15. It is estimated that half of all SSIs are preventable 16. Preventing SSIs is not only beneficial for the patient but could also provide a source of cost savings for the hospital. To reduce the probability of an SSI, basic protocols which include hand decontamination, sterile drapes and gowns, gloves – preferably double gloving to avoid risk of perforation – and antiseptic skin preparation should all be utilised.

What can be done by technology?

Technology examples:

4
4

During hospital stay and recovery

Patients staying at a hospital expect to recover quickly and receive the best possible care without being exposed to any unnecessary harm. Developing a resistant infection can prolong hospital stay, impede quick recovery, and increase healthcare costs. Appropriate use of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics can help avoid unnecessary and costly therapies, reduce exposure to antibiotics, resulting in more predictable patient pathways, reduced length of stay, and lower probability of re-admissions.

What can be done by technology?

Technology examples:

5
5

Discharged and back at home

There is an increasing trend towards outpatient clinics and day surgery, meaning that patients continue to be treated in other healthcare facilities or in their home environment, thereby reducing the demand on healthcare resources.

What can be done by technology?

Technology examples:

Latest resources

Available to download.

Preventing AMR and HAIs: MedTech Europe Leave-Behind
Download
Safeguarding Europe’s future: a call to action on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections
Download
The role of medtech in the fight against superbugs
Download
Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) brochure
Download

AMR

About MedTech Europe

Our mission is to make value-based, innovative medical technology available to more people, while supporting the transformation of healthcare systems onto a sustainable path.

More

Contact MedTech Europe

Web: www.medtecheurope.org
Email: [email protected]
Phone: + 32 (0)2 300 96 43

In partnership with

  1. OECD (2023), Embracing a One Health Framework to Fight Antimicrobial Resistance. OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing
  2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2008). Annual epidemiological report on communicable diseases in Europe 2008. Report on the state of communicable diseases in the EU and EEA/EFTA countries
  3. Global leader’s group on AMR 2024
  4. ECDC. Antimicrobial consumption in the EU/EEA (ESAC-Net) Annual Epidemiological Report for 2023.
  5. Cost-effectiveness of screening, decolonisation and isolation strategies for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitals: a sex-stratified mathematical modelling study; Kasim Allel, Patricia Garcia, Anne Peters, Jose Munita, Eduardo A. Undurraga, Laith Yakob The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, Volume 43, March 2025, 101019
  6. Tolley A et al. J Antimicrob Chemother 2024
  7. Scandret K et al. [B] Evidence review for rapid tests to inform triage and antibiotic prescribing decisions. NICE guideline NG237 2023; Smedemark SA et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2022; Zhang K et al. J Thorac Dis 2022; O’Brien et al. EUnetHTA Project ID: OTCA012. 2019; Verbakel et al. BMJ Open 2019
  8. Maltezou, H.C. et al., 2008
  9. NICE Evidence Review 2023
  10. Kardas-Sloma 2022
  11. Clark 2023
  12. Posnakoglou 2022
  13. Sundelin 2023
  14. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000; 38 (3): 261–271.
  15. Ayliffe GA. Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;13 Suppl 10:S800-4. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s800. PMID: 1754788.
  16. Umscheid, CA, Mitchell, MD, Doshi, JA, Agarwal, R, Williams, K, Brennan, PJ. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):101-14.
  17. Recommendations | Plus Sutures for preventing surgical site infection | Guidance | NICE
  18. Zucconi 2022
  19. Bejko 2015
  20. Pliakos 2018, Yo 2022
  21. Garnfelt 2023
  22. Nault 2017
  23. Laka 2020